Show Notes – Revolution Radio 2023-11-17 #111

The tools of war and love

Government Is Like Fire, a Dangerous Servant and a Fearful Master

https://quoteinvestigator.com/2015/05/26/fire-servant/

(1:45)

Six Federal Cases of Self-Represented Litigants Citing Fake Cases in Briefs, Likely Because They Used AI Programs

(3:15)

Froemming’s 49-page brief contains a table of “authorities” with reference to case citations, federal statutes, and an ABA ethics rule. None of these “authorities” serve to aid this Court in the review of this matter and none of them are supportive of Froemming’s arguments. First of all, only three of Froemming’s fifteen listed cases even exist within the federal reporter. However, those three cases decide topics entirely unrelated to Froemming’s arguments. Further, the quotes in his brief do not exist anywhere within those cases.

https://reason.com/volokh/2023/11/13/self-represented-litigants-use-ai-to-write-briefs-produce-hallucinated-citations/

Calif. Collecting BILLIONS of Data Points on Kids for “Cradle-to-Career” System

(14:45)

“These outside agencies do not have to comply with the same standards and laws for surveying minors as the school or Local Education Agency does,” she told The Newman Report, noting that multiple operations in California were surveying children without parental permission. “This is another layer of deception so parents should guard against this false sense of security given by their schools.”

https://www.freedomproject.com/2023/11/08/tnr11823/

(21:45)

Judge under investigation for AI-authored ruling

(22:50)

A Brazilian federal judge in the northern state of Acre has been ordered to explain how he came to publish an error-riddled decision co-authored by AI chatbot ChatGPT in a first-of-its-kind case for the country, authorities confirmed to AFP on Monday.

The National Justice Council (CNJ) has given Judge Jefferson Rodrigues 15 days to explain a decision bristling with incorrect details about previous court cases and legal precedent, including the erroneous attribution of past decisions to the Superior Court of Justice, case records revealed.

https://www.rt.com/news/587261-brazilian-judge-chatgpt-decision-mistakes/

Car ‘Kill Switch’ – House Vote Fails To Remove From Bill

(29:30)

Guess What Was Hiding in That 1000-pg Bill

“This is in the law. This will become law in 2026. Every vehicle manufactured after that. And it’s not about drunk driving. If it were, it would just be about blood alcohol content. This law has far more than that in it. It violates the Fourth Amendment. It violates so many amendments. It violates things that are so fundamental to our rights that they’re not even in the Constitution, like the right to travel. And so I urge support of this amendment. It will defund the law that was passed two years ago, that the other side of the aisle doesn’t even know exists.”

It’s an open-and-shut case, yet all the Democrats and 19 Republicans voted to keep the kill switch.

The rate at which things are getting crazier is truly out of control

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/11/thomas-woods/guess-what-was-hiding-in-that-1000-pg-bbill/

(35:45)

Swan Song for Free & Fair
Elections in the U.S.

Oscar Stilley’s substack

(33:55)

I’ve pulled dockets from a lot of jurisdictions, and I’ve never seen worse. Fulton County has docket item numbers for the judges and prosecutors, but not for the defense or for the public. That’s a shameless and severe application of the thumb to the scales of justice.

Keep in mind that you the taxpayer have already paid all the tax dollars necessary to build and maintain a very suitable electronic filing and service system, for the federal courts. It’s called Case Management/Electronic Case Filing. PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records makes these documents available to the public, at 10 cents per page, billed quarterly. Various services such as PacerPro allow for convenient mass downloads.

State court prosecutors could work out a deal to use that software for state court records – if they wanted it. Worst case scenario they could develop their own, that works just as well or better.

Fani & her cronies don’t want that, precisely because it tends toward a more accurate determination of truth, and less toward the “shooting fish in a barrel” prosecutorial model. Mind you, PACER does not ensure honesty in judicial processes. It just militates in favor of honesty and openness.

https://oscarstilley.substack.com/p/swan-song-for-free-and-fair-elections-110

All the President’s Men: The Ethics of Disputing the 2020 Election

It is highly likely that the Court of Appeals (now the Supreme Court of Maryland) would find that a Maryland attorney involved in the same or similar litigation that Mr. Giuliani was involved in, particularly concerning false claims of voter fraud, engaged in conduct that was prejudicial to the administration of justice under Maryland Rule 19-308.4(d). The Supreme Court of Maryland has repeatedly held that as for purported violations of Rule 8.4(d), that “we employ different standards in determining whether a lawyer’s conduct is prejudicial to the administration of justice based on whether that conduct is related to the practice of law.” AGC v. Markey, 469 Md. 485, 501, 230 A.3d 942 (2000). When the “conduct is related to the practice of law, a lawyer’s conduct is prejudicial to the administration of justice if it would negatively impact [the] perception of the legal profession of a reasonable member of the public.” AGC v. Maiden, 480 Md. 1, 17, 279 A.3d 940, 950-51 (2022) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted).

https://www.gdldlaw.com/blog/all-the-presidents-men-the-ethics-of-disputing-the-2020-election

Hour 2

Swan Song for Free & Fair Elections in the U.S.

Continued from first hour.

https://oscarstilley.substack.com/p/swan-song-for-free-and-fair-elections-110

(27:00)

What’s in it for me?

You need someone to be your friend,
Stick by you through thick or thin,
What’s in it for me?
What’s in it for me?!

My comments on oscar stilley, Dave champion, and myself regarding the law and you

(28:05)

This topic is tricky. It’s like I’m stepping out of line. But here’s the deal – I want to help you see the big picture. Oscar Stilley was in federal tax court defending Mr. Springer with an argument based on the Paperwork Reduction Act. This law says that a government form isn’t valid unless it has an OMB number, and since the 1040 tax form didn’t have it, their claim was you didn’t have to fill it out. This was a big thing back in the day.

Oscar was doing well with this defense until the DOJ had had enough of him. They put him behind bars, but he didn’t lose his spirit. He stayed sharp and ready to fight.

I once talked to him about Edgar Steele, another fighter for the underdog, on my radio show. Edgar took on tough cases, but his downfall was that he let anger get to him while in prison, and it took a toll on him.

Oscar served around 10 years in prison for making an argument that embarrassed the government. They took away his license to practice law. But he’s not giving up, and I think we should support him.

I often mention David Champion and his book “Income Tax: Shattering the Myth.” He shows that most of us don’t have to pay income tax. This is something Oscar hadn’t realized in his own fight.

I’ve been involved with the freedom movement for years, meeting people from the film “America: Freedom to Fascism”, and others who stand for truth and transparency in our system.

The actual issue is understanding the law as written. Oscar dealt with lots of obstacles trying to uncover the truth, just like many others who fight for clarity in our legal system.

David Champion dug deep and found that average folks aren’t legally required to pay income tax as we thought. That’s more crucial than any form or loophole.

What I teach about foreclosure gets down to the basics too, cutting through all the noise and confusion. It’s about getting straight to the core.

Congress hasn’t imposed the income tax on the average person—you.

Likewise with foreclosure I’ve learned the core argument. I didn’t come up with it myself. When I heard it, it made sense to me.

It doesn’t click for most, but here’s the deal: if someone can’t prove they have the right to enforce your mortgage note, they can’t use the mortgage against you.

They can’t enforce it without showing their rights under the UCC.

Sorry, bank. Try again later.

Many people over-complicate things, missing the forest for the trees.

Oscar’s got a lot on his plate. He’s fighting hard, working on his appeal to show the higher courts that he’s been wronged. He never got to invoke his right to appeal because he didn’t have access to the complete record. You need the complete record to make your case in an appeal, which Oscar never received.

Once he’s finished, Oscar and I are going to discuss Dave Champion and the law in general. Our conversations are always interesting. Oscar is busy dealing with what they did to him. But once he gets how the tax code works, I think he’ll be a force to reckon with.

You too can be dangerous, when it comes to foreclosure.

Your tools of love and war
–
The courts and foreclosure Part 4

(38:20)

The basics of answering the bank’s Complaint, with the upgrade of bullet-proof affirmative defense.

“War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.”

J.R.R. Tolkien, The Two Towers

Every sentient creature acts in ways that it perceives to be in its own economic interests . . .

Oscar Stilley