Circa 2006 at Front Sight firearms training
The Hidden Legal Realities That Overturned Roe v Wade And May Overturn Much More
“The Supreme Court said that the Fourteenth Amendment applied to blacks held in slavery that had become free and to their posterity, and others similarly situated.”
42 U.S. Code § 1981
Equal rights under the law
(a) Statement of equal rights
All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property AS IS ENJOYED BY WHITE CITIZENS, and SHALL BE SUBJECT TO LIKE punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other.
(b) “Make and enforce contracts” defined
For purposes of this section, the term “make and enforce contracts” includes the making, performance, modification, and termination of contracts, and the enjoyment of all benefits, privileges, terms, and conditions of the contractual relationship.
(c) Protection against impairment
The rights protected by this section are protected against impairment by nongovernmental discrimination and impairment under color of State law.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1981
Abraham Lincoln’s Most Enduring Speeches and Quotes
Nonetheless, despite his deep opposition to slavery, Lincoln did not believe in racial equality. He made this point clear during his famed debates against rival Stephen A. Douglas during their race for the U.S. Senate seat from Illinois:
“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and Black races.…
I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office…there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will for ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. . . .” —Lincoln-Douglas debates, September 18, 1858
https://www.history.com/news/abraham-lincoln-famous-quotes-speeches
McDonald v. Chicago, 2010
Questions as Framed for the Court by the Parties
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/08-1521
Whether the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms is incorporated as against the States by the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities or Due Process Clauses.
* * *
This case will consider a century-old precedent concerning the scope of the Privileges and Immunities and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. If the Court sides with Petitioners Otis McDonald, et al., it may reverse the Slaughterhouse line of cases and incorporate the Second Amendment—and possibly the entire Bill of Rights—against the States. On the other hand, if the Court sides with Respondent, City of Chicago, et al., it will uphold the Slaughterhouse cases and restrict the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment.
What the Dobbs Decision overturning Roe v. Wade was about
Constitutional structural problems
Roe was also egregiously wrong and deeply damaging. For reasons already explained, Roe’s constitutional analysis was far outside the bounds of any reasonable interpretation of the various constitutional provisions to which it vaguely pointed.
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, No. 19-1392 (June 24, 2022)
Roe was on a collision course with the Constitution from the day it was decided, Casey perpetuated its errors, and those errors do not concern some arcane corner of the law of little importance to the American people. Rather, wielding nothing but “raw judicial power,” Roe , 410 U.S., at 222
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, No. 19-1392 (June 24, 2022)
I suggest you do a word search for the word egregious. It appears 22 times.
prior decisions that could face a Constitutional Challenge
under the Dobbs test
Same sex marriage
Blacks have a right to marry white people
Interracial marriage
Black students have a Constitutional right not to be segregated.
Separate but equal racial double standard
The first section of the statute enacts “that all railway companies carrying passengers in their coaches in this State, shall provide equal but separate accommodations for the white, and colored races, by providing two or more passenger coaches for each passenger train, or by dividing the passenger coaches by a partition so as to secure separate accommodations: Provided, That this section shall not be construed to apply to street railroads. No person or persons, shall be admitted to occupy seats in coaches, other than, the ones, assigned, to them on account of the race they belong to.”
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896)
Supreme Court Holds ‘Miranda’ Violations Don’t Confer a Right to Sue under §1983
The Court next explained that a judicially created prophylactic rule should only apply where its benefits outweigh its costs. As a result, the Court was required to determine whether it should be applied to permit the assertion of Miranda claims under §1983. In short, the Court stated that the benefits would be “slight” and the costs would be “substantial.”
https://www.fedagent.com/news/supreme-court-holds-miranda-violations-dont-confer-a-right-to-sue-under-1983
Hour 2
Political analysis, is not legal analysis
When the Gig is Up
The United States is a hollowed-out stump, just sitting in the way. It’s given up the power of individual rights and freedoms, values that allowed for a meteoric rise to world dominance. It traded them in for communist values of the collective, open borders and the welfare state. It’s been conned out of its value and the only way back is to take a huge gulp of reality, plant the flag and enforce those values.
That means trials and executions.
For now, I’m just waiting for that first Tarot card to be flipped over and the whole fraud to come to light.
It’s their play.
https://tldavis.substack.com/p/when-the-gig-is-up
An examination of Citizen v. citizen
Civil Rights Act of 1866
The author of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 was United States Senator Lyman Trumbull.[4] Congressman James F. Wilson summarized what he considered to be the purpose of the act as follows, when he introduced the legislation in the House of Representatives:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1866
“It provides for the equality of citizens of the United States in the enjoyment of “civil rights and immunities.” What do these terms mean? Do they mean that in all things civil, social, political, all citizens, without distinction of race or color, shall be equal? By no means can they be so construed. Do they mean that all citizens shall vote in the several States? No; for suffrage is a political right which has been left under the control of the several States, subject to the action of Congress only when it becomes necessary to enforce the guarantee of a republican form of government (protection against a monarchy). Nor do they mean that all citizens shall sit on the juries, or that their children shall attend the same schools. The definition given to the term “civil rights” in Bouvier’s Law Dictionary is very concise, and is supported by the best authority. It is this: “Civil rights are those which have no relation to the establishment, support, or management of government.””
Freedmen’s Bureau
In 1863, the American Freedmen’s Inquiry Commission was established. Two years later, as a result of the inquiry the Freedmen’s Bureau Bill was passed, which established the Freedmen’s Bureau as initiated by U.S. PresidentAbraham Lincoln. It was intended to last for one year after the end of the Civil War. The Bureau became a part of the United States Department of War, as Congress provided no funding for it. The War Department was the only agency with funds the Freedmen’s Bureau could use and with an existing presence in the South.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedmen%27s_Bureau
We will continue with the paper on Citizenship in a future program.
SWAT Team Blew Up Innocent Woman’s Home, and Gave Her the $50,000 Bill
Baker claims, and rightfully so, that cops went overboard on the damage they caused, completely disregarding any measures that could’ve limited the destruction to her home. For example, cops blew up her garage door to gain entry, despite being given a garage door opener.
https://thefreethoughtproject.com/swat-team-blew-up-innocent-womans-home-and-gave-her-the-50000-bill-but-she-fought-them-and-won/
Music Credits
Afternoon Delight – Starland Vocal Band (1976)
https://youtu.be/q4b3w6a9cSk
Bad Boys (Theme From Cops)
https://youtu.be/bBD8M3WFrAw
Danheim – Mannavegr (Full Album 2017) Viking Era & Viking War Music
https://youtu.be/8tilKaOINmE
Warren Zevon – Lawyers, Guns and Money 1978
https://youtu.be/F2HH7J-Sx80
Mason Proffit – Two Hangmen
https://youtu.be/CC3yZdG_2Bc
Copyright 2022. All rights reserved in print and audio content.