Show Notes – Revolution Radio 2022-08-10

– Flat-Earth Special –
Make million$ with an FCA lawsuit.
They can settle it once-and-for-all.
Flat-Earthers have the facts, science, and case. Or do they?

What evidence has NASA provided that their DSCOVR satellite is real and the photos we see from it were taken 1 million miles away between the Sun and Earth?

You must think NASA employees are pretty stupid. Under the False Claims Act, NASA employees who report fraud are eligible to receive a reward of 15–25%. DSCOVR cost $340 million, so a whistleblower might get over $34 million.

The entire premise that the US government would fake a satellite is one of the stupidest things I have ever heard. There are many other governments and entities that would love to embarrass the US by proving that one of our satellites is fake, because that would show that the US is a fraud.

https://debunkingflatearth.quora.com/What-evidence-has-NASA-provided-that-their-DSCOVR-satellite-is-real-and-the-photos-we-see-from-it-were-taken-1-million-m-14

First: You know someone who knows someone who knows something.

Six degrees of separation is the idea that all people are six or fewer social connections away from each other. As a result, a chain of “friend of a friend” statements can be made to connect any two people in a maximum of six steps. It is also known as the six handshakes rule.

The concept was originally set out in a 1929 short story by Frigyes Karinthy, where a group of people play a game trying to connect any person in the world to themselves by a chain of five others.

It was popularized in John Guare’s 1990 play Six Degrees of Separation.The idea is sometimes generalized to the average social distance being logarithmic in the size of the population.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_degrees_of_separation

Second: File a Qui Tam action (lawsuit)

Qui Tam

In common law, a writ of qui tam is a writ through which private individuals who assist a prosecution can receive for themselves all or part of the damages or financial penalties recovered by the government as a result of the prosecution. Its name is an abbreviation of the Latin phrase qui tam pro domino rege quam pro se ipso in hac parte sequitur, meaning “[he] who sues in this matter for the king as well as for himself.”

The writ fell into disuse in England and Wales following the Common Informers Act 1951 but remains current in the United States under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., which allows a private individual, or “whistleblower” (or relator), with knowledge of past or present fraud committed against the federal government to bring suit on its behalf.

* * *

“Whistleblower” can mean any person who reveals misconduct by his or her employer or another business or entity. The misconduct may be in the form of breaking the law, committing fraud, or corruption. In the United States, that type of fraud may be a violation of the False Claims Act, or similar state and local laws, and a whistleblower who exposes fraud on the government may bring a qui tam lawsuit on behalf of the government and potentially receive a share of the recovery recovered by the government as a reward for bringing that action.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qui_tam

False Claims Act

The False Claims Act (FCA),[1] also called the “Lincoln Law”, is an American federal law that imposes liability on persons and companies (typically federal contractors) who defraud governmental programs. It is the federal government’s primary litigation tool in combating fraud against the government.[2] The law includes a qui tam provision that allows people who are not affiliated with the government, called “relators” under the law, to file actions on behalf of the government. This is informally called “whistleblowing”, especially when the relator is employed by the organization accused in the suit. Persons filing actions under the Act stand to receive a portion (15–30%, depending on certain factors) of any recovered damages.[3]
As of 2019, over 71% of all FCA actions were initiated by whistleblowers.[4] Claims under the law have typically involved health care, military, or other government spending programs, and dominate the list of largest pharmaceutical settlements. Between 1987 and 2019, the government recovered more than $62 billion under the False Claims Act.[5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_Claims_Act

31 U.S. Code § 3729 – False claims

(a) Liability for Certain Acts.—
(1) In general.—Subject to paragraph (2), any person who—
(A) knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval;
(B) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim;
(C) conspires to commit a violation of subparagraph (A), (B), (D), (E), (F), or (G);
(D) has . . .

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/3729

Third: Collect millions in bribes (hush money) to settle the suit.

You too can join the ranks of millions of insiders who know the Earth is flat but propagate the globe theory. Whether for money or duty to the secret. You can earn millions and prove the Earth if flat with the courts.

Just one little problem.

To do so, you may have to master some areas of math in this little book. I got mine back in 1980. It’s a first edition.

It’s a funny thing: Electronics is math (my background); engineering is math; and geo-spatial science/imaging are math. https://eos.com/blog/geospatial-technology/

I am sure (with a snarky smile) that anyone qualified to debunk the globe theory can debunk a page or two in this encyclopedia.

Below is part of the back cover show the topics touched in encyclopedic form.

Sarcasm warning: The globe is just one big hoax conducted by those in the know. You know, the ones that know the real mathematics; not the math that supports the globe theory, such as in the encyclopedia above.

When you can find the flaw in this book, let me know and I will help you make millions in hush money. PS: There are a lot of ‘globe-like’ illustrations in the book. Good luck with reading the captions; you know, the words under the pictures.

Hour 2

Pfizer Trial Whistleblower Presses Forward With Lawsuit Without US Government’s Help

Jackson filed a False Claims Act suit against Pfizer, Ventavia, and another company involved in the trial, ICON. It has been under seal for over a year, but is now public after the U.S. Department of Justice declined to intervene on behalf of Jackson.

Government lawyers did not explain the choice not to intervene and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which investigates alleged clinical trial fraud, did not respond to a request for comment.

The choice, though, has not deterred the whistleblower.

https://yournews.com/2022/02/15/2299622/pfizer-trial-whistleblower-presses-forward-with-lawsuit-without-us-governments/

Alex Jones and the court’s rules

Alex Jones loses court battle over defamation of Sandy Hook families

Citing the conspiracy theorist’s failure to produce financial documents and information about his websites, a judge in Connecticut called default judgment the appropriate sanction.

WATERBURY, Ct. (CN) — A defamation case against Infowars creator Alex Jones for saying that the Sandy Hook school shooting was a hoax ended in default judgment Monday following his failure to cooperate in discovery.

Ruling from the bench Tuesday morning in Fairfield District Superior Court, Judge Barbara Bellis said Jones frustrated efforts by the families of victims from the 2012 massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, to get information about Jones’ business finances and the analytics of how his social media posts and websites performed.

“Discovery isn’t supposed to be a guessing game,” Bellis said, noting a default judgment is a sanction of last resort and that her decision was not a punishment.

“The court held off on scheduling the sanctions hearing in the hopes that many of these problems would be corrected and that the Jones defendants would ultimately comply with their discovery obligations,” Bellis said.

https://www.courthousenews.com/sandy-hook-families-double-down-with-alex-jones-default-judgment/

Discovery Based Default

Using Georgia as an example which is typical of most states

2020 Georgia Code, Title 9 – Civil Practice, Chapter 11 – Civil Practice Act
Article 5 – Depositions and Discovery
§ 9-11-37. Failure to Make Discovery; Motion to Compel; Sanctions; Expenses

. . . the court in which the action is pending may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just and, among others, the following:

1. An order that the matters regarding which the order was made or any other designated facts shall be taken to be established for the purposes of the action in accordance with the claim of the party obtaining the order;
2. An order refusing to allow the disobedient party to support or oppose designated claims or defenses, or prohibiting him from introducing designated matters in evidence;
3. An order striking out pleadings or parts thereof, or staying further proceedings until the order is obeyed, or dismissing the action or proceeding or any part thereof, or rendering a judgment by default against the disobedient party;
4. In lieu of any of the foregoing orders, or in addition thereto, an order treating as a contempt of court the failure to obey any orders except an order to submit to a physical or mental examination; or
5. Where a party has failed to comply with an order under subsection (a) of Code Section 9-11-35 requiring him to produce another for examination, such orders as are listed in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of this paragraph, unless the party failing to comply shows that he is unable to produce such person for examination.

https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2020/title-9/chapter-11/article-5/section-9-11-37/

Remainder of recordings

Indiana Rule of Evidence 106.
Remainder of or Related Writing or Recorded Statements

If a party introduces all or part of a writing or recorded statement, an adverse party may require the introduction, at that time, of any other part—or any other writing or recorded statement—that in fairness ought to be considered at the same time.

https://www.in.gov/courts/rules/evidence/#_Toc373857050

Federal Rules of Evidence 106.
Remainder of or Related Writings or Recorded Statements

If a party introduces all or part of a writing or recorded statement, an adverse party may require the introduction, at that time, of any other part — or any other writing or recorded statement — that in fairness ought to be considered at the same time.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_106

Music Credits

Danheim – Mannavegr (Full Album 2017) Viking Era & Viking War Music
https://youtu.be/8tilKaOINmE

Sector Space
https://sectorradio.ru/space/

Lauren Weintraub – The Earth Is Flat (Official Music Video)
https://youtu.be/iP8CPQmNHTg

Barenaked Ladies – Flat Earth (Official Audio)
https://youtu.be/tgyKISW_elQ

Mason Proffit – Two Hangmen
https://youtu.be/CC3yZdG_2Bc

Copyright 2022. All rights reserved in print and audio content.