The existential threat to you and America
Law bad – gambling good
Gambling bad – law good
Societal break
(10:30 min.)
“We are going to lie to you, deny the truth wherever it presents itself and you are going to believe the lies, shout the lies with all your breath or you are going to be punished.”
https://tldavis.substack.com/p/societal-break
The Corruption of
POTUS, SCOTUS and SCROTUS
(19:30 min.)
Until we reach that point of social transformation, we’re passengers on a ship of state doomed by rampant, systemic corruption and the collapse of moral standards and the rule of law.
Then there’s SCROTUS: the Supremely Corrupt Royalty of the United States, the corporate bigshots, the lobbyists, the billionaires, the politically influential, the financially connected, and all the elites that are protected from consequence and therefore untouchable.
https://www.oftwominds.com/blogjun23/corruption6-23.html
this is how the typical Law-Fi Fool* sounds in court.
(29:45 min.)
* Law fiction fool.
Find Preforeclosure Homes Near You
Preforeclosures are loans on property that are in default and in the process of being foreclosed by the lender. This situation presents an opportunity for a first time homebuyer, flipper, or real estate investor. In a pre-foreclosure the homeowner is still in possession of the property but is struggling with his mortgage payments. The bank or mortgage company wants its money, but the borrower does not have the means to pay. In most instances the borrower and lender want to avoid the final foreclosure, a lengthy and expensive process that is a terrible mark on the borrower’s credit and places the lender in . . .
https://www.foreclosure.com/preforeclosures/
Conversations with Eagle Flower
(47:00 min.)
Tend to your soul. Experience the world for what it is at this very moment.
How can you be ‘in the moment’ if you are trying to frame a picture to share?
Reflect. Ponder.
Fully experience the convergence of the past and present—now. There is no rewind.
Please listen to:
Revolution Radio
Wednesday, Studio A, 4:00 PM Eastern
Listen here: https://revolution.radio/
Hour 2
Goodman v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.,
No. 22-5238 (6th Cir. 2023)
Goodman twice unsuccessfully attempted to cash the checks. Months later, after exchanging text messages with Martinek, Goodman was heading to Commercial Bank when Martinek sent an “everything stopped” message. Goodman asked for cashier’s checks in exchange for the Southern checks, without mentioning his past attempts to negotiate the checks. The teller did not check the balance in Southern’s account but printed “teller’s checks” payable to Goodman for $100,000 and $200,000. When the teller realized the account lacked sufficient funds, the Bank issued a stop payment order.
Goodman sued to enforce the checks. The Bank counterclaimed for restitution. Under Tennessee’s Commercial Code, if Commercial Bank paid the checks by “mistake” and Goodman had taken those checks in “good faith” and “for value,” the Bank was not entitled to restitution. The district court held that Commercial Bank paid the checks by mistake and that Goodman did not give value. The Sixth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Commercial Bank.
As the U.C.C.’s drafters seemingly anticipated, the flurry of day-to-day commercial transactions across the country sometimes results in parties to those transactions making mistakes in their dealings. How to resolve those mistakes, one might imagine, could easily spark debate, if not outright disagreement. To provide a uniform legal framework for resolving those disputes in an efficient manner, the U.C.C. sets out rules for assessing which party to a transaction should bear the costs attributable to the mistake. The rules vary depending on the nature of the transaction. Compare U.C.C. § 2-209 (Am. L. Inst. & Unif. L. Comm’n) (remedies for error in a contract governed by U.C.C. Article 2), with id. § 3-418 (discussing mistaken payment of a negotiable instrument under U.C.C. Article 3); and id. § 9-506 (addressing mistakes in certain secured transactions under U.C.C. Article 9). At issue here is Article 3— payment of a negotiable instrument. See id. § 3-104 (a check is a negotiable instrument).
Goodman v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co., No. 22-5238 (6th Cir. 2023)
Collapsitarianism, Multi-generational Goals & Survival
(9:30 min.)
Credits
Danheim – Mannavegr (Full Album 2017) Viking Era & Viking War Music
https://youtu.be/8tilKaOINmE
Waffenruhe – War Chant Ritual
https://youtu.be/brczxLKD9jY
Sector Space
https://sectorradio.ru/space/
Mason Proffit – Two Hangmen
https://youtu.be/CC3yZdG_2B
Copyright 2023. All rights reserved in print and audio content.